netdev - Re: [PATCH] openvswitch: using nla_for_each

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEP_g=_D1m+p0POKC5ozFEgfEhGzN9G_+Yja_iBz4guuRe6Nog@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 7 Oct 2012 11:30:51 -0700
From:	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
To:	Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@...il.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn,
	dev@...nvswitch.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] openvswitch: using nla_for_each_X to simplify the code

On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
>
> Using nla_for_each_nested() or nla_for_each_attr()
> to simplify the code.
>
> dpatch engine is used to auto generate this patch.
> (https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch)
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>

It is done this way intentionally to avoid checks on the fast path for
conditions that have already been validated.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html