[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1349725592.21172.3685.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 21:46:32 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, rick.jones2@...com,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jesse@...ira.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] napi: limit GRO latency
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 12:40 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 21:30:12 +0200
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > System is under stress, you dont want to increase load at this point,
> > but increase bandwidth.
> >
> > Really try this on a 40Gbe link and see how bad it is.
>
> Not everybody has 40Gbe hardware just lying around available for testing :-)
;)
In fact, the current strategy to flush napi_gro when napi completes
might be not good for moderate traffic (thats 99% of the linux machines
I believe). We could have a deferred flush instead...
I dont know what strategy is used by hardware. But surely hardware uses
timers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists