[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1349689640.21172.3008.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:47:20 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: adam.niescierowicz@...tnet.pl
Cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.4.1 and 3.5-rc1 Packet lost at 250Mb/s
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 11:29 +0200, Nieścierowicz Adam wrote:
> >
> > You should use RPS on eth2/eth3 because they are non multi queue.
> >
> > Documentation/networking/scaling.txt should give you all the needed
> > info
>
> I set processors for rps such as affinity, unfortunately it did not
> help
>
> ---
> cat /sys/class/net/eth{2,3,4,5}/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
> 0040
> 0080
> 0100
> 0200
> ---
> CPU affinity http://wklej.org/id/843161/
>
>
I said eth2 and eth3
And you should use cpu11->cpu15 instead of cpu6->cpu9 since they are in
use...
Anyway you dont say where are drops, (ifconfig give us very few drops)
Also your eth0 seems to have a strange balance :
RX interrupts seems to be well balanced on 4 queues :
76: 503 0 169271690 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-rx-0
77: 405 0 0 164532538 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-rx-1
78: 408 0 0 0 152778723 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-rx-2
79: 349 0 0 0 0 155011301 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-rx-3
80: 144 0 443432394 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-tx-0
81: 18 0 0 2043311 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-tx-1
82: 30 0 0 0 1934537 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-tx-2
83: 137 0 0 0 0 1968272 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-tx-3
But TX seems to mostly use queue 0
Packets sent to eth0 are coming from where ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists