[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVNearJj+o7s=Pk=tyQBnwvapEX=pe9A+AxheiSNGZBdyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 19:29:44 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] usbnet: introduce usbnet 3 command helpers
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de> wrote:
> That depends on whether an API change would be necessary.
> Changing the code only when necessary is no problem. But the
> API I want to do right from the beginning if that is possible.
For the auto-resume situation, the current API is OK even without
changes to task_struct.
>
> This depends on whether you get in your extension to task_struct.
> If you do, we can certainly use it also for the suspend case.
I will do it.
>
>> For error handling case, it is inevitably for usbnet to allocate memory
>> with GFP_KERNEL because no usbnet drivers have implemented
>> .pre_reset and .post_reset callback, and no such actual problems
>> have been reported until now, so it should be OK to not consider the
>> case now.
>>
>> So could we merge the patch set[1-11] first?
>
> Given the solution for error handling you came up with, yes, we can.
> Would you resubmit?
OK, will do it.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists