[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201210111335.43177.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:35:42 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Subject: Re: alignment faults in 3.6
On Thursday 11 October 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On 10/11/2012 07:40 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 12:28 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Rob Herring as the original reporter has dropped off the Cc list, adding
> >> him back.
> >>
> >> I assume that the calxeda xgmac driver is the culprit then. It uses
> >> netdev_alloc_skb() rather than netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align() in
> >> xgmac_rx_refill but it is not clear whether it does so intentionally
> >> or by accident.
>
> This in fact does work and eliminates the unaligned traps. However, not
> all h/w can do IP aligned DMA (i.MX FEC for example), so I still think
> this is a questionable optimization by the compiler. We're saving 1 load
> instruction here for data that is likely already in the cache. It may be
> legal per the ABI, but the downside of this optimization is much greater
> than the upside.
>
What about the other approach that Eric suggested for such hardware
in http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg200206.html ?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists