[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVOChR3ZJSyjo44AMwzzjx5URWvEe25KY2eV5evJpF9D+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:17:57 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, jkosina@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] usbnet: introduce usbnet 3 command helpers
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 11 October 2012 10:36:22 Alan Stern wrote:
>
>> It's worse than you may realize. When a SCSI disk is suspended, all of
>> its ancestor devices may be suspended too. Pages can't be read in from
>> the drive until all those ancestors are resumed. This means that all
>> runtime resume code paths for all drivers that could be bound to an
>> ancestor of a block device must avoid GFP_KERNEL. In practice it's
>> probably easiest for the runtime PM core to use tsk_set_allowd_gfp()
>> before calling any runtime_resume method.
>>
>> Or at least, this will be true when sd supports nontrivial autosuspend.
>
> Up to now, I've found three driver for which tsk_set_allowd_gfp() wouldn't
> do the job. They boil down into two types of errors. That is surprisingly good.
Looks all are very good examples, :-)
>
> First we have workqueues. bas-gigaset is a good example.
> The driver kills a scheduled work in pre_reset(). If this is done synchronously
> the driver may need to wait for a memory allocation inside the work.
> In principle we could provide a workqueue limited to GFP_NOIO. Is that worth
> it, or do we just check?
The easiest way is to always call tsk_set_allowd_gfp(~GFP_IOFS) in the
start of work function under the situation, and restore the flag in the end
of the work function.
>
> Second there is a problem just like priority inversion with realtime tasks.
> usb-skeleton and ati_remote2
> They take mutexes which are also taken in other code paths. So the error
> handler may need to wait for a mutex to be dropped which can only happen
> if a memory allocation succeeds, which is waiting for the error handler.
Suppose mutex_lock(A) is called in pre_reset(), one solution is that
always calling tsk_set_allowd_gfp(~GFP_IOFS) before each mutex_lock(A).
We can do it only for devices with storage interface in current
configuration.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists