[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1350492636.2884.5.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:50:36 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] ipv6: Enable enough of the code to handle GSO when
disabled.
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 18:13 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 11:46 -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>
> > This patch attempts to solve this by enabling just enough code so GSO
> > is correctly processed. However, I should point out that if IPv6 is
> > simply blacklisted or not built for the kernel, this problem will
> > still persist.
>
> So I guess this should be done in a different way ?
>
> We currently use a single structure (struct packet_type) to hold
> pointers to different methods. (The .func() field, and the gso/gro
> stuff)
>
> We probably need to split it in two parts, and make one part linked into
> kernel, even if CONFIG_IPV6=n, so that GRO/GSO is fully IPv4/IPv6
> functional.
[...]
Either that or make sure that we don't advertise IPv6 GSO when IPv6 is
disabled.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists