[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121017054343.GA12671@secunet.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:43:43 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: use ISO C standard for array in linux/xfrm.h
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 05:42:33PM +0200, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com wrote:
> From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
>
> Use the ISO C standard compliant form instead of the gcc extension.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h b/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h
> index 28e493b..6a6a605 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ struct xfrm_sec_ctx {
> __u8 ctx_alg;
> __u16 ctx_len;
> __u32 ctx_sid;
> - char ctx_str[0];
> + char ctx_str[];
Hm, what's the benefit of such a change? The kernel source is full
of these foo[0] type arrays. I don't see a reason to change this
just for xfrm.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists