netdev - Re: Question about Mellanox FW reporting (incorrect) port types

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <507F0BD5.7080005@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:49:41 -0300
From:	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>
To:	Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
CC:	Yevgeny Petrilin <yevgenyp@...lanox.co.il>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@....mellanox.co.il>
Subject: Re: Question about Mellanox FW reporting (incorrect) port types

On 10/17/2012 04:22 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...] So my questions are: is it possible to the firmware report a wrong port type like
>> that? Is it somehow configurable by sysadmin (via fw update, ..), can we flip that byte
>> or is it a manufacturing issue?
>
>
> I'm not sure, Yevgeny/Yishai do you have any insights here?
>
>> I can't try upstream driver
>
> why?! netdev is dealing with upstream, isn't it?

Yes, it is. By upstream I actually mean a non-RHEL kernel/driver. I 
tried but so far couldn't reproduce this issue in-house, sorry. My ports 
always answer ETH :) So I have to ask for customer to test and then 
unfortunately things get complicated..

Thanks,
Marcelo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html