netdev - Re: Bug? TCP shutdown behaviour when deleting local IP addresses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <507FA2AE.1080509@genband.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:33:18 -0600
From:	Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org,
	kaber@...sh.net, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: Bug? TCP shutdown behaviour when deleting local IP addresses

On 10/17/2012 05:27 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Chris Friesen<chris.friesen@...band.com>
> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:01:40 -0600
>
>> I sent this to the list yesterday (from another address) but didn't
>> get any responses.  Accordingly I'm expanding the receiver list to the
>> listed maintainers for IPv4/IPv6.
>
> It can take more than 24 hours to get a response from people who are
> volunteers, and who will reply to your report because they want to
> rather than because they are obligated.
>
> Posting it again just irritates such people, and will place your
> report at a much lower priority, just FYI.

Thanks for the pointers.  I was worried that it had gone unnoticed, but 
I guess the level of traffic on netdev is small enough (compared to 
something like lkml) that that's generally not an issue.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html