lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2012 02:14:50 -0700
From:	Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	enh <enh@...gle.com>,
	Venkat Venkatsubra <venkat.x.venkatsubra@...cle.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: listen(2) backlog changes in or around Linux 3.1?

> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> index ef998b0..0404926 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ int tcp_v4_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>          * clogging syn queue with openreqs with exponentially increasing
>          * timeout.
>          */
> -       if (sk_acceptq_is_full(sk) && inet_csk_reqsk_queue_young(sk) > 1)
> +       if (__sk_acceptq_is_full(sk, inet_csk_reqsk_queue_young(sk)))
>                 goto drop;
>

For what its worth, I think the changes make sense. But is there any
reason to exclude old request_socks in the  call to
__sk_acceptq_is_full().?
as in
      if (__sk_acceptq_is_full(sk, inet_csk_reqsk_queue_len(sk)))
               goto drop;

I am not sure why the current code looks only at young request_socks.
Thanks,
Vijay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists