netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1350642889.2293.419.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:34:49 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
Cc:	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable

On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 13:55 +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> The SO_BINDTODEVICE option is the only SOL_SOCKET one that can be set, but
> cannot be get via sockopt API. The only way we can find the device id a
> socket is bound to is via sock-diag interface. But the diag works only on
> hashed sockets, while the opt in question can be set for yet unhashed one.
> 
> That said, in order to know what device a socket is bound to (we do want
> to know this in checkpoint-restore project) I propose to make this option
> getsockopt-able and report the respective device index.
> 
> Another solution to the problem might be to teach the sock-diag reporting
> info on unhashed sockets. Should I go this way instead?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 8a146cf..c49412c 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -1074,6 +1074,9 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
>  	case SO_NOFCS:
>  		v.val = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_NOFCS);
>  		break;
> +	case SO_BINDTODEVICE:
> +		v.val = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		return -ENOPROTOOPT;
>  	}

This looks quite reasonable to me.

Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html