[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5085B63E.5070504@parallels.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 01:10:22 +0400
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable
On 10/23/2012 12:45 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 14:04 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
>
>> + char devname[IFNAMSIZ];
>> +
>> + ret = 0;
>> + if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if == 0)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + if (len < IFNAMSIZ)
>> + goto out;
>> + if (len > IFNAMSIZ)
>> + len = IFNAMSIZ;
>> +
>> + rcu_read_lock();
>> + dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, sk->sk_bound_dev_if);
>> + if (dev)
>> + strcpy(dev->name, devname);
>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>
> You probably meant
>
> strcpy(devname, dev->name)
>
> By the way, this is not really safe in case device is renamed
Good point, actually. Getting a device name may be not very safe in terms of --
once we have the name there's no 100% guarantee, that this name corresponds to the
actual device the socket is bound to (it could be renamed after we strcpy-ed its
name). This problem doesn't exist when we get device index, as it cannot be changed.
Thanks,
Pavel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists