netdev - Re: [net-next 2/8] maintainers: update with official intel support link, new maintainer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Oct 2012 22:13:40 -0700
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Tushar Dave <tushar.n.dave@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 2/8] maintainers: update with official intel support
 link, new maintainer

On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 21:52 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 21:32 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 06:25 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 03:24 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> 
> > > > Add the current e1000 maintainer to the list of Intel maintainers.
> 
> > > Maybe add an internal exploder to get all the various
> > > maintainers on a list if everyone really looks at all
> > > patches to intel drivers.
> 
> > > INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS
> > > M:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> > > M:	Intel Linux Support <linux.drivers@...el.com>
> > > T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net.git
> > > T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-next.git
> > > S:	Supported
> > > F:	drivers/net/ethernet/intel/
> 
> > I understand where your coming from and this has been been something
> > that I have been trying to find a "reasonable" solution, which is harder
> > to do than one would expect.
> []
> > So how do we go about giving this spider web of complex coverage to some
> > clear concise coverage in the MAINTAINERS?
> []
> > If you have some ideas which may help resolve the issues, I am open to
> > suggestions.
> 
> It's great that they all work on all intel drivers, but it seems
> that you are the nominal maintainer and they are all developers
> that might work on anything but nothing in particular.
> 
> I think an internal exploder email address would work well.
> 
That sounds good, I will discuss it with guys and figure it out.
Thanks!

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)