netdev - Re: qmi-wwan bug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <943c3dc1-8bc7-4678-a6fd-adc5051f331c@email.android.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2012 23:19:07 +0200
From:	Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To:	"Shawn J. Goff" <shawn.goff@...elecon.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: qmi-wwan bug



"Shawn J. Goff" <shawn.goff@...elecon.com> wrote:

>I've backported qmi-wwan to 2.6.39 (it's here: 
>https://bitbucket.org/accelecon/linux-at91/changesets), and it mostly 
>works, but I've come across a problem. The modem will sometimes stop 
>responding to any qmi data (but the AT commands on the TTY ports keep 
>working). This only happens when there is significant traffic flowing 
>through the device (downloading a large file) while at the same time,
>AT 
>commands are sent to one of the TTY ports (I first noticed with my own 
>modem query program, but I can reproduce it using microcom to send 
>"ATI\r" in a loop). 

Using the tty ports should be completely independent of any qmi activity from the host perspective. I am tempted to claim this indicates a firmware bug.

> I see this problem with different devices from 
>different manufacturers. 

Which still may use pretty much the same firmware, although a little less likely.

> I've only made it happen on my kernel - I
>tried 
>on 3.6.2, but it seems to not happen there.

Good. But I have a feeling that you switched more than just the kernel. Do you see the issue if you run your backport on the same hardware you tested 3.6.2 on?

 > I've also tried using a 
>similar modem that uses a different driver (sierra-net) and that
>doesn't 
>have the same problem.

Well, that is an entirely different firmware application and driver, even if the hardware is similar or even identical.

>When it is in failure, if I try to ping an address, the system sends
>out 
>several an ARP requests but gets no response. To get the device to 
>respond again, I have to administratively set the wwan interface down, 
>then up, use libqmi to get the connection going again, then dhcp to get
>
>an address.

Which sounds like the connection died. Does QMI work at this point, or is that dead too?

>I also have some USB traces of the failure and recovery process. I'm
>not 
>familiar with CDC or QMI, so it's not yet clear to me exactly what's 
>happening, but it looks like the modem just stops sending anything on 
>its QMI endpoint for no reason.
>
>How might I dive further into the issue? So far, my next step is to
>look 
>into CDC and QMI and try to decypher the USB traces. If anyone is 
>interested, I can share a tcpdump or a USB trace.

I think a test of the backport on the same host hardware you run 3.6.2 on would be the best place to start.

Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html