netdev - [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Add support for hardware-offloaded encapsulation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:38:58 -0700
From:	Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@...el.com>
To:	davem@...emloft.net, shemminger@...tta.com, chrisw@...s-sol.org
Cc:	Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@...el.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Add support for hardware-offloaded encapsulation

This is an RFC and not intended to get merged at the moment.
The series contains updates to add in the NIC Rx and Tx checksumming support
for encapsulated packets.

The sk_buff needs to somehow have information of the inner packet, and adding
three fields for the inner mac, network and transport headers was the prefered
approach. 

Not adding these fields would mean that the drivers would need to parse the
sk_buff data in hot-path, having a negative impact in the performance.

Adding in sk_buff a pointer to the skbuff of the inner packet made sense, but
would be a complicated change as assumptions needed to be made with regards to
helper functions such as skb_clone() skb_copy(). Also code for the existing
encapsulation protocols (such as VXLAN and IP GRE) had to be reworked, so the
decision was to have the simple approach of adding these three fields.

Version 2 has the mbox format corrected for this patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html