[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGK4HS_DVtvEf78r3z_RoOWSyBCjqSVmFPtpEztDw=W5UkCvrw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:16:46 -0700
From: Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: enh <enh@...gle.com>,
Venkat Venkatsubra <venkat.x.venkatsubra@...cle.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: listen(2) backlog changes in or around Linux 3.1?
On 25 October 2012 15:50, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:11 -0700, Vijay Subramanian wrote:
>
>> >
>> > All these facilities sound very complex and not really usable by clients
>> > (ie users not willing to wait more than few seconds anyway)
>> >
>>
>> Fair enough. We can drop this if it is not worth the trouble or if I
>> have missed any other scenario.
>>
>
> Sorry my comment was not related to your patch, but existing logic.
>
> It seems there is no value resending SYNACK, as we received the client
> ACK.
>
> Please send an official patch ?
>
>
>
Eric,
I will send a patch shortly.
Thanks,
Vijay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists