netdev - RE: [RFC PATCH 1/2] net: Add support for hardware-offloaded encapsulation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <F9D617782E85934FB0AD6CD1BA0C8EE7324B7663@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Oct 2012 19:54:12 +0000
From:	"Gasparakis, Joseph" <joseph.gasparakis@...el.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC:	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"chrisw@...s-sol.org" <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 1/2] net: Add support for hardware-offloaded
 encapsulation

Stephen, are you happy with Ben's comment?
If that is the case I would prefer to keep the patch as is as I believe it makes sense to group the features that way.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:bhutchings@...arflare.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 3:21 PM
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: Gasparakis, Joseph; davem@...emloft.net; chrisw@...s-sol.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] net: Add support for hardware-offloaded encapsulation

On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 14:16 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:29:12 -0700
> Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ enum {
> >  	NETIF_F_IP_CSUM_BIT,		/* Can checksum TCP/UDP over IPv4. */
> >  	__UNUSED_NETIF_F_1,
> >  	NETIF_F_HW_CSUM_BIT,		/* Can checksum all the packets. */
> > +	NETIF_F_HW_CSUM_ENC_BIT,	/* Can checksum all inner headers */
> >  	NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM_BIT,		/* Can checksum TCP/UDP over IPV6 */
> >  	NETIF_F_HIGHDMA_BIT,		/* Can DMA to high memory. */
> >  	NETIF_F_FRAGLIST_BIT,		/* Scatter/gather IO. */
> > @@ -52,6 +53,8 @@ enum {
> >  	NETIF_F_NTUPLE_BIT,		/* N-tuple filters supported */
> >  	NETIF_F_RXHASH_BIT,		/* Receive hashing offload */
> >  	NETIF_F_RXCSUM_BIT,		/* Receive checksumming offload */
> > +	NETIF_F_RXCSUM_ENC_BIT,		/* Receive checksuming offload */
> > +					/* for encapsulation */
> >  	NETIF_F_NOCACHE_COPY_BIT,	/* Use no-cache copyfromuser */
> >  	NETIF_F_LOOPBACK_BIT,		/* Enable loopback */
> >  	NETIF_F_RXFCS_BIT,		/* Append FCS to skb pkt data */
> 
> Add new features at the end, or reuse __UNUSED_ bits to avoid any 
> issues with binary compatibility. I don't think these bits are in any 
> userspace API, maybe ethtool?

There should be no binary compatibility issue here as feature bits are meant to be looked up by name at run-time.

Ben.

--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.