netdev - Re: [PATCH] gianfar_ptp: use iomem, not ioports resource tree in probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121026103243.GA3092@netboy.at.omicron.at>
Date:	Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:32:44 +0200
From:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:	Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
Cc:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Wei Yang <Wei.Yang@...driver.com>,
	Manoil Claudiu-B08782 <B08782@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gianfar_ptp: use iomem, not ioports resource tree in
 probe

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 03:17:48PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> 
> I'm sorry for what I said.  It was inappropriate.  I deal with crappy code
> from co-workers on a daily basis, and sometimes I forgot that just because
> something is done differently than I would have done it, that doesn't mean
> it's wrong.

Thanks for that apology. Now my wounded pride has recovered :)

> I actually did that research and saw Grant's comments.  I asked him about
> it on IRC, and although I understand his reasoning, I'm not sure I agree
> with all of it.  In particular, I think
> platform_get_resource/request_resource/ioremap is less elegant than just
> calling of_iomap.

No comment from me, since I always seem to lose at the DT game.

Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html