[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADVnQynrVqFKOiqB7891hSKLZmQ0GXDiVypop75YB-6RYdjUtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:27:06 -0400
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@...il.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Venkat Venkatsubra <venkat.x.venkatsubra@...cle.com>,
Elliott Hughes <enh@...gle.com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: better retrans tracking for defer-accept
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> @@ -2638,7 +2642,7 @@ static void get_openreq4(const struct sock *sk, const struct request_sock *req,
...
> - req->retrans,
> + req->num_retrans,
...
> @@ -1866,7 +1869,7 @@ static void get_openreq6(struct seq_file *seq,
...
> - req->retrans,
> + req->num_timeout,
...
There's a slight inconsistency in the changes to get_openreq4() and
get_openreq6() - the first now uses num_retrans and the second now
uses num_timeout.
Otherwise LGTM.
neal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists