lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:19:49 -0400
From:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Cc:	Michele Baldessari <michele@...syn.org>,
	"linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: support per-association stats via a new
 SCTP_GET_ASSOC_STATS call

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 04:11:50PM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 10/29/2012 12:38 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:48:33AM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On Oct 27, 2012, at 7:35 AM, Michele Baldessari <michele@...syn.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi Neil & Vlad,
> >>>
> >>>On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:37:04AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> >>>>We already have files in /proc/net/sctp to count snmp system-wide totals,
> >>>>per-endpoint totals, and per association totals.  Why do these stats differently
> >>>>instead of just adding them the per-association file?  I get that solaris does
> >>>>this, but its not codified in any of the RFC's or other standards.  I would
> >>>>really rather see something like this go into the interfaces we have, rather
> >>>>than creating a new one.
> >>>>
> >>>>I also am a bit confused regarding the stats themselves.  Most are fairly clear,
> >>>>but some seem lacking (you count most things sent and received, but only count
> >>>>received gap acks).  Others seems vague and or confusing (when counting
> >>>>retransmitted chunks and packets, how do you count a packet that has both new
> >>>>and retransmitted chunks)?  And the max observed rto stat is just odd.  Each
> >>>>transport has an rto value, not each association, and you cal already see the
> >>>>individual transport rto values in /proc/net/sctp/remaddr.
> >>>
> >>>thanks a lot for your time reviewing this. I will try to address all
> >>>your comments in a second version of the patch. One thing I am not too
> >>>sure though: do you prefer me extending /proc/net/sctp/* or implement a
> >>>new call.
> >>>
> >>>I ask because from a previous private communication with Vlad the new
> >>>socket option seemed to be the preferred approach.
> >>>I am fine either way just let me know ;)
> >>
> >>
> >>socket option is preferable as /proc doesn't scale very well as number of associations grows.
> >>
> >>-Vlad
> >>
> >I completely agree with that notion, but at the same time, the socket option is
> >limited in that these stats will only be accessible to the process that owns the
> >socket.  I imagine that someone will eventually ask for these stats to be made
> >available to utilities outside of the owning socket.
> >Neil
> 
> I am sure they will, but I know of several applications that as part
> of debugging information periodically fetch the stats.  For them it
> is much simpler to use socket options.
> 
> -vlad
> 
Ok, fair enough.
Neil

> >
> >>>
> >>>cheers,
> >>>--
> >>>Michele Baldessari            <michele@...syn.org>
> >>>C2A5 9DA3 9961 4FFB E01B  D0BC DDD4 DCCB 7515 5C6D
> >>--
> >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> >>the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> >>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ