[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACiLriQnQcoXFqrqNt3nkY47nR8FnXbqWjtPRp250gueHSMDmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:22:51 -0700
From: HÃ¥vard Skinnemoen <havard@...nnemoen.net>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, plagnioj@...osoft.com,
patrice.vilchez@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
manabian@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] net/macb: clean up ring buffer logic
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:12 AM, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
>> Instead of masking head and tail every time we increment them, just let them
>> wrap through UINT_MAX and mask them when subscripting. Add simple accessor
>> functions to do the subscripting properly to minimize the chances of messing
>> this up.
> ...
>> +static unsigned int macb_tx_ring_avail(struct macb *bp)
>> +{
>> + return TX_RING_SIZE - (bp->tx_head - bp->tx_tail);
>> +}
>
> That one doesn't look quite right to me.
> Surely it should be masking with 'TX_RING_SIZE - 1'
Why is that? head and tail can never be more than TX_RING_SIZE apart,
so it shouldn't make any difference.
Havard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists