lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <508F969C.9080300@midlink.org>
Date:	Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:58:04 +0100
From:	Steven Barth <steven@...link.org>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Steven Barth <steven@...link.org>
Subject: IPV6_PKTINFO seems not to be honored correctly by RAW-sockets

Hi,

I recently noticed that there might be an unexpected behavior in the 
handling of IPV6_PKTINFO for RAW-sockets. It seems that the given 
destination interface is ignored.

I just reproduced this on 3.7.0-rc3 vanilla but some quick tests with 
2.6.32 and 3.5 distro-kernels on different machines showed the same.

I've noticed this first in my own software but I could also reproduce it 
easily with standard tools like ping6 from iputils:

Have 2 network interfaces with (global) IPv6-addresses assigned (e.g. 
eth0 with fd00::1/64 and eth1 with fd01::1/64) and do a ping6 -I eth1 
fd00::1 (ping6 from iputils uses IPV6_PKTINFO internally).

For me the result was that even though I set the interface to eth1 the 
ECHO was still send to eth0.

Also (although probably unrelated) forwarding for IPv6 was disabled.

If I try something similar with IPv4 and ping -I ... the ECHO doesn't go 
out on eth0 but - as expected - on eth1.

However if I use traceroute(6) with -I (ICMP-traceroute) and the -i 
option to determine the interface, packages seem to be sent through the 
expected interface. Internally it seems that traceroute(6) uses 
SO_BINDTODEVICE instead of IP(V6)_PKTINFO which seems to work.

So it seems there might be something wrong with IPV6_PKTINFO or is this 
expected behavior?


Thanks and Regards,

Steven
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ