[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1351589962.17077.36.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:39:22 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@...lesie.net>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] pppoatm: protect against freeing of vcc
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 19:14 +0200, Krzysztof Mazur wrote:
> The pppoatm gets a reference to atmvcc, but does not increment vcc
> usage count. The vcc uses vcc->sk socket for reference counting,
> so sock_hold() and sock_put() should be used by pppoatm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@...lesie.net>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Acked-By: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>
But did you spot what's in the end of the context of the first hunk...?
> --- a/net/atm/pppoatm.c
> +++ b/net/atm/pppoatm.c
> @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ static void pppoatm_unassign_vcc(struct atm_vcc
> *atmvcc)
> tasklet_kill(&pvcc->wakeup_tasklet);
> ppp_unregister_channel(&pvcc->chan);
> atmvcc->user_back = NULL;
> + sock_put(sk_atm(pvcc->atmvcc));
> kfree(pvcc);
> /* Gee, I hope we have the big kernel lock here... */
> module_put(THIS_MODULE);
Fairly sure that hope is unfounded these days... :)
--
dwmw2
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (6171 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists