[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121031154216.GB9558@1984>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:42:16 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailing list
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Networking Developer Mailing List
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] back on nf_tables (plus compatibility layer)
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 02:50:27PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Friday 2012-10-26 13:04, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> >>
> >> Meanwhile, I am on xtables2 that actually reproduces the set of
> >> _really important_ features that currently are in the setsockopt
> >> iptables, like atomic table replace and atomic dump.
> >>
> >> I have updated to the newest tree, and the first set is
> >> available in the git repository at:
> >> git://git.inai.de/linux xt2-20121025
> >
> >If you think this feature is important, checkout nf_tables and think
> >how to integrate this prototype code that provides atomic table
> >replacement to it.
>
> I'd rather tinker with xt2.
You're are free spend your time on your pet project, but I warn you:
it will *extremely hard* to justify its inclusion into mainline.
As said, I don't think it makes sense to add two firewall
engines/interfaces for the same thing. And the compatibility layer
provides an utility with similar syntax and semantics to iptables.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists