[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wqy54vo0.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 18:11:35 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Sjur Brændeland <sjur@...ndeland.net>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
sjur@...ndeland.net, dmitry.tarnyagin@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [RFC virtio-next 0/4] Introduce CAIF Virtio and reversed Vrings
Sjur Brændeland <sjur@...ndeland.net> writes:
> Zero-Copy data transport on the modem is primary goal for CAIF Virtio.
> In order to achieve Zero-Copy the direction of the Virtio rings are
> flipped in the RX direction. So we have implemented the Virtio
> access-function similar to what is found in vhost.c.
So, this adds another host-side virtqueue implementation.
Can we combine them together conveniently? You pulled out more stuff
into vring.h which is a start, but it's a bit overloaded.
Perhaps we should separate the common fields into struct vring, and use
it to build:
struct vring_guest {
struct vring vr;
u16 last_used_idx;
};
struct vring_host {
struct vring vr;
u16 last_avail_idx;
};
I haven't looked closely at vhost to see what it wants, but I would
think we could share more code.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists