[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5093940B.6020207@parallels.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:36:11 +0400
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
To: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Change getsockopt() of SO_BINDTODEVICE
to return an interface name
> +static int sock_getbindtodevice(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
> + int __user *optlen, int len)
> +{
> + int ret = -ENOPROTOOPT;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NETDEVICES
> + struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
> + struct net_device *dev;
> + char devname[IFNAMSIZ];
> +
> + if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if == 0) {
> + len = 0;
> + goto zero;
> + }
> +
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + if (len < IFNAMSIZ)
> + goto out;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, sk->sk_bound_dev_if);
> + if (dev)
> + strcpy(devname, dev->name);
This still races with the device name change, potentially providing
a name which never existed in the system, doesn't it?
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + if (!dev)
> + goto out;
> +
> + len = strlen(devname) + 1;
> +
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + if (copy_to_user(optval, devname, len))
> + goto out;
> +
> +zero:
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + if (put_user(len, optlen))
> + goto out;
> +
> + ret = 0;
> +
> +out:
> +#endif
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
Thanks,
Pavel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists