[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121104075555.GB24262@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 08:55:55 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] Avoid 'statement with no effect' compiler warnings
On Sun, 04 Nov 2012, David Miller wrote:
> From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 23:02:30 +0100
>
> > Instead of issuing (0) statements when !CONFIG_SYSFS which will cause
> > 'warning: ', we'll use inline statements instead. This will effectively
> > do the same thing, but suppress any unnecessary warnings.
> >
> > Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
> > Cc: bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>
> Applied, but please use more informative subject lines.
>
> You should prefix your subject line after [PATCH ...] with
> the name of the subsystem you are touching, a ": " then
> the headline description.
>
> So here you would have used "bridge: " and that's what I added when I
> commited this patch.
Yes, of course I should have done, and usually do.
This was an oversight, sorry about that.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists