lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20121104075555.GB24262@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 08:55:55 +0100 From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] Avoid 'statement with no effect' compiler warnings On Sun, 04 Nov 2012, David Miller wrote: > From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> > Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 23:02:30 +0100 > > > Instead of issuing (0) statements when !CONFIG_SYSFS which will cause > > 'warning: ', we'll use inline statements instead. This will effectively > > do the same thing, but suppress any unnecessary warnings. > > > > Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com> > > Cc: bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org > > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> > > Applied, but please use more informative subject lines. > > You should prefix your subject line after [PATCH ...] with > the name of the subsystem you are touching, a ": " then > the headline description. > > So here you would have used "bridge: " and that's what I added when I > commited this patch. Yes, of course I should have done, and usually do. This was an oversight, sorry about that. -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists