lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 12:42:19 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com> To: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] eth: Rename and properly align br_reserved_address array On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:33:55 -0700 John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com> wrote: > On 11/1/2012 12:12 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Since this array is no longer part of the bridge driver, it should > > have an 'eth' prefix not 'br'. > > > > We also assume that either it's 16-bit-aligned or the architecture has > > efficient unaligned access. Ensure the first of these is true by > > explicitly aligning it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> > > --- > > Thanks. > > Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com> > I wonder if aligning to 64 bit and doing 64 bit read and mask would be trivially more efficient for this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists