netdev - Re: tc filter u32 match

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c3bfe7201cd3e7ecc751139ec32ada2e@justnet.pl>
Date:	Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:36:38 +0100
From:	Nieścierowicz Adam <adam.niescierowicz@...tnet.pl>
To:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tc filter u32 match

W dniu 24.05.2012 12:04, Jamal Hadi Salim napisał(a):

> On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 15:42 +0200, Nieścierowicz Adam wrote:
>
>> Hello, I'm in the process of building a new shaper, when adding 
>> support
>> for 802.1q vlan noticed that u32 can catch network traffic without
>> giving 4 bytes offset. How is this possible?
>
> Because we look at where the network header starts?
> Why do you expect 4 bytes to be counted?
>
>> My environment: eth2 - network card eth2.200 - vlan /sbin/tc filter 
>> add
>> dev eth2 parent 1:0 prio 5 handle 35: protocol ip u32 divisor 256
>> /sbin/tc filter add dev eth2 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 5 u32 ht 
>> 800::
>> match ip dst 31.41.208.32/27 hashkey mask 0x000000ff at 16 link 35:
>> /sbin/tc filter add dev eth2 protocol ip parent 1: prio 1 u32 ht 
>> 35:24:
>> match ip dst 31.41.208.36 flowid 1:2e5 Here you can see the hits in 
>> the
>> rule filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 35:24:800 order 2048
>> key ht 35 bkt 24 flowid 1:2e5 (rule hit 44037 success 44037) match
>> 1f29d024/ffffffff at 16 (success 44037 )
>
> I dont see an issue. This looks correct.
>
>>> I found a similar question here
>>
>
http://serverfault.com/questions/370795/tc-u32-how-to-match-l2-protocols-in-recent-kernels
>>
>
> There may have been bugs in the past that someone missed or didnt
> report here (likely around the time there was a lot of changes
> happening with vlan offloading). Try the latest kernel and
> if it behaves badly, send a report and a reproducible test case.

Hello Again,

I changed the kernel to 3.6.0 and ip traffic classification on the
interface and vlan works fine.
Unfortunately I am not able to classify
PPPoE traffic, I checked filters with offset: 16, 20, 24, 28

Is it possible to classify PPPoE traffic on the main interface as it 
was in previous kernels?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html