[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <509CD046.4060302@6wind.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:43:34 +0100
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: export IP6_RT_PRIO_* to userland
Le 05/11/2012 20:24, Nicolas Dichtel a écrit :
> Le 05/11/2012 18:43, David Miller a écrit :
>> From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
>> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:22:39 +0100
>>
>>> Le 05/11/2012 18:00, David Miller a écrit :
>>>> From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
>>>> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 16:28:18 +0100
>>>>
>>>>> The kernel uses some default metric when routes are managed. For
>>>>> example, a
>>>>> static route added with a metric set to 0 is inserted in the kernel
>>>>> with
>>>>> metric 1024 (IP6_RT_PRIO_USER).
>>>>> It is useful for routing daemons to know these values, to be able to
>>>>> set routes
>>>>> without interfering with what the kernel does.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
>>>>
>>>> But these belong in the libc headers anyways.
>>>>
>>>> If we haven't provided them for so long, there's no real value of
>>>> adding them now.
>>>>
>>> But how can a daemon know which default values are used? If it wants
>>> to add a route with metric = default + x, it should first add it with
>>> metric = 0, check the result and then change the metric.
>>
>> What do we do on the ipv4 side and how do daemons cope in that situation?
>>
> In IPv4, there is no such default metric. If you add a route with metric X, it
> remains X in the kernel, even if it's 0.
So we need to duplicate these values in the daemon?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists