netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] ipip: advertise tunnel param via rtnl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1352490168.19779.776.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Fri, 09 Nov 2012 11:42:48 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] ipip: advertise tunnel param via rtnl

On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 18:00 +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:

> If the principle is approved, yes. If we add it, we will have two
> ways to manage these tunnels, via netlink and via ioctl, is it ok?
> 
> A side effect could be to have an option or an argument to the module to not 
> create the control interface (tunl0, sit0, ...).

The principle is already used for gre tunnels, so it definitely is
approved ;)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html