[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1352653401.9449.131.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:03:21 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@...lesie.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chas Williams - CONTRACTOR <chas@....nrl.navy.mil>,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/7] pppoatm: fix missing wakeup in pppoatm_send()
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 17:12 +0100, Krzysztof Mazur wrote:
> It would require using atomic ops because also pppoatm_pop() can
> modify this word. I think it's better to add additional word instead
> of using atomic ops.
Or use the existing flags word, perhaps. Only one bit of which is
actually used already. We'd have to filter the new bit out in
pppoatm_devppp_ioctl().
--
dwmw2
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (6171 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists