lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121114231452.GH27068@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Nov 2012 00:14:52 +0100
From:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, davem@...emloft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/13] net: Add net protocol offload registration infrustructure

Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com> :
[...]
> diff --git a/include/net/protocol.h b/include/net/protocol.h
> index 929528c..d8ecb17 100644
> --- a/include/net/protocol.h
> +++ b/include/net/protocol.h
> @@ -77,6 +77,15 @@ struct inet6_protocol {
>  #define INET6_PROTO_GSO_EXTHDR	0x4
>  #endif
>  
> +struct net_offload {
> +	int			(*gso_send_check)(struct sk_buff *skb);
> +	struct sk_buff	       *(*gso_segment)(struct sk_buff *skb,
> +					       netdev_features_t features);
> +	struct sk_buff	      **(*gro_receive)(struct sk_buff **head,
> +					       struct sk_buff *skb);
> +	int			(*gro_complete)(struct sk_buff *skb);
> +};

Would it be worth adding a #14 where packet_offload and net_offload
share a common offload struct instead of duplicating (currently) identical
members ?

-- 
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ