[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1352859861.4497.0.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:24:21 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/13] net: Add generic packet offload
infrastructure.
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 20:24 -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> Create a new data structure to contain the GRO/GSO callbacks and add
> a new registration mechanism.
>
> Singed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 15 ++++++++
> net/core/dev.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index f8eda02..d15af51 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -1511,6 +1511,18 @@ struct packet_type {
> struct list_head list;
> };
>
> +struct packet_offload {
> + __be16 type; /* This is really htons(ether_type). */
> + struct net_device *dev; /* NULL is wildcarded here */
Shouldnt this dev pointer be removed at some point in the patch serie ?
> + struct sk_buff *(*gso_segment)(struct sk_buff *skb,
> + netdev_features_t features);
> + int (*gso_send_check)(struct sk_buff *skb);
> + struct sk_buff **(*gro_receive)(struct sk_buff **head,
> + struct sk_buff *skb);
> + int (*gro_complete)(struct sk_buff *skb);
> + struct list_head list;
> +};
> +
> #include <linux/notifier.h>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists