[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50A396AE.5090608@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:03:42 -0500
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/13] net: Add generic packet offload infrastructure.
On 11/13/2012 09:24 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 20:24 -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>> Create a new data structure to contain the GRO/GSO callbacks and add
>> a new registration mechanism.
>>
>> Singed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/netdevice.h | 15 ++++++++
>> net/core/dev.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> index f8eda02..d15af51 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> @@ -1511,6 +1511,18 @@ struct packet_type {
>> struct list_head list;
>> };
>>
>> +struct packet_offload {
>> + __be16 type; /* This is really htons(ether_type). */
>> + struct net_device *dev; /* NULL is wildcarded here */
>
> Shouldnt this dev pointer be removed at some point in the patch serie ?
yes. i was thinking about this as well. I actually shouldn't have been
carried into this struct to begin with since its not really being used
by the offload calls.
-vlad
>
>> + struct sk_buff *(*gso_segment)(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> + netdev_features_t features);
>> + int (*gso_send_check)(struct sk_buff *skb);
>> + struct sk_buff **(*gro_receive)(struct sk_buff **head,
>> + struct sk_buff *skb);
>> + int (*gro_complete)(struct sk_buff *skb);
>> + struct list_head list;
>> +};
>> +
>> #include <linux/notifier.h>
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists