[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50A57141.1000803@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:48:33 -0500
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/14] Always build GSO/GRO functionality into the
kernel
On 11/15/2012 05:42 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> All applied to net-next, but there were some minor conflicts (an
> IS_ENABLED() conversion happened in ip6_output.c in net-next but the
> context in your patch didn't have it) and git warnings (trailing
> whitespace in the final patch).
>
> I fixed them all up, but this is something you can easily take care
> of yourself in the future.
>
> Thanks.
>
sorry, the patches were bases on net-2.6. That's probably why you saw
the conflicts. I wasn't sure where they should go since they actually
fix a long standing issue, so I bases them net-2.6.
Sorry, and thanks for fixing things up.
-vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists