[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50A4CE84.6090802@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:14:12 +0800
From: ANNIE LI <annie.li@...cle.com>
To: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
CC: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@....fi>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Implement persistent grant in xen-netfront/netback
On 2012-11-15 18:56, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 15/11/12 09:38, ANNIE LI wrote:
>>
>> On 2012-11-15 15:40, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 03:03:07PM +0800, Annie Li wrote:
>>>> This patch implements persistent grants for xen-netfront/netback. This
>>>> mechanism maintains page pools in netback/netfront, these page pools is used to
>>>> save grant pages which are mapped. This way improve performance which is wasted
>>>> when doing grant operations.
>>>>
>>>> Current netback/netfront does map/unmap grant operations frequently when
>>>> transmitting/receiving packets, and grant operations costs much cpu clock. In
>>>> this patch, netfront/netback maps grant pages when needed and then saves them
>>>> into a page pool for future use. All these pages will be unmapped when
>>>> removing/releasing the net device.
>>>>
>>> Do you have performance numbers available already? with/without persistent grants?
>> I have some simple netperf/netserver test result with/without persistent
>> grants,
>>
>> Following is result of with persistent grant patch,
>>
>> Guests, Sum, Avg, Min, Max
>> 1, 15106.4, 15106.4, 15106.36, 15106.36
>> 2, 13052.7, 6526.34, 6261.81, 6790.86
>> 3, 12675.1, 6337.53, 6220.24, 6454.83
>> 4, 13194, 6596.98, 6274.70, 6919.25
>>
>>
>> Following are result of without persistent patch
>>
>> Guests, Sum, Avg, Min, Max
>> 1, 10864.1, 10864.1, 10864.10, 10864.10
>> 2, 10898.5, 5449.24, 4862.08, 6036.40
>> 3, 10734.5, 5367.26, 5261.43, 5473.08
>> 4, 10924, 5461.99, 5314.84, 5609.14
> In the block case, performance improvement is seen when using a large
> number of guests, could you perform the same benchmark increasing the
> number of guests to 15?
Sure, but my current local environment does not meet such test
requirement, let me find an environment and then start such test.
Thanks
Annie
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists