lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:26:28 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Jon Mason <jon.mason@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
	Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] net: Add support for NTB virtual ethernet device

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 06:13:53PM -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:30:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:11:09PM -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
> > > A virtual ethernet device that uses the NTB transport API to
> > > send/receive data.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...el.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
> > > ---
> > >  MAINTAINERS              |    1 +
> > >  drivers/net/Kconfig      |    4 +
> > >  drivers/net/Makefile     |    1 +
> > >  drivers/net/ntb_netdev.c |  415 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 
> > As I haven't taken the core yet, I can't take this.  But even then, I
> > would need an ack from the network maintainers before I could.
> 
> I have been Cc'ing netdev on these patches and gotten many good
> comments, but I can cc Dave Miller explicitly on my next version (as
> there will obviously need to be one based on your comments on the
> previous patch).

Don't cc: David, that's not the way to do it :)

> > And are you sure this is in the correct location in the tree?
> 
> I assumed that the virtual network client that uses NTB as a transport
> would best fit in the network drivers.  Is this a bad assumption?

No, but if you look, drivers/net/ has been cleaned up a bunch, so
perhaps a subdirectory under there is best.  I'll leave that up to the
netdev developers to discuss.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ