lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:02:02 -0500 (EST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: shemminger@...tta.com Cc: paolo.valente@...more.it, jhs@...atatu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, rizzo@....unipi.it, fchecconi@...il.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: QFQ Plus: fair-queueing service at DRR cost From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:53:04 -0800 > There are actually lots of bogus warnings than seem to only occur > because gcc 4.4 does a bad job of checking. Later versions are fixed > and don't generate warnings. > > My preference is to not add the unnecessary initialization because > if you get in the habit of doing it. The whole purpose of the uninitialized > check is lost. Try again, this was with gcc-4.7.2-2 on Fedora. There are too many preconditions, across multiple basic block, which together ensure the skb is in fact initialized at the point in question and the compiler simply isn't sophisticated enough to see that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists