netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] ipip: allow to deactivate the creation of fb dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50AB3F99.7070701@6wind.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:30:17 +0100
From:	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] ipip: allow to deactivate the creation of
 fb dev

Le 20/11/2012 01:07, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:46:11 +0100
>
>> By default, the fb device is created, so there is no change if you
>> don't set explicitly setup_fb to 0.
>
>
> Nicolas, this idea is contentous to me too.
>
> Why not put this aside and submit the other parts of your
> patch set on their own, since those looked fine to me?
Ok, no problem. I wanted to get feedback about this kind of idea, I understand 
the point.

When you said "the other parts", you mean only patch 2/4 (sit: allow to 
configure 6rd tunnels via netlink) or 3/4 and 4/4 too?
Because 3/4 and 4/4 are equivalent to this one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html