[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3602626.rWyvU1cq5r@bentobox>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:28:36 +0100
From: Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>
To: Kevin Curtis <Kevin.Curtis@...site.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"ordex@...istici.org" <ordex@...istici.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"b.a.t.m.a.n@...ts.open-mesh.org" <b.a.t.m.a.n@...ts.open-mesh.org>,
"lindner_marek@...oo.de" <lindner_marek@...oo.de>,
"linux-driver@...gic.com" <linux-driver@...gic.com>,
"ron.mercer@...gic.com" <ron.mercer@...gic.com>,
"jitendra.kalsaria@...gic.com" <jitendra.kalsaria@...gic.com>,
"rmody@...cade.com" <rmody@...cade.com>,
"andy@...yhouse.net" <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"fubar@...ibm.com" <fubar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] batman-adv: Use packing of 2 for all headers before an ethernet header
On Thursday 22 November 2012 08:12:38 Kevin Curtis wrote:
> >> Agree. But we should get this message also to the other guys
>
> What message would this be?
> Are you advocating a different use of #pragma pack()?
David started this discussion and his statement was:
> The __packed attribute is an abstraction of the actual syntax the
> compiler uses, if it is supported at all.
>
> Therefore, you can't just unconditionally use the #pragma, and you
> would need to use some kind of similar compiler abstraction for it.
So yes, it sounds to me like "don't use #pragma but think about some
abstraction".
Kind regards,
Sven
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists