netdev - Re: [PATCH] 8139cp: set ring address after enabling C+ mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20121121.181234.1434014622958965841.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:12:34 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dwmw2@...radead.org
Cc:	romieu@...zoreil.com, jgarzik@...ox.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, hayeswang@...ltek.com, gilboad@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 8139cp: set ring address after enabling C+ mode

From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:52:54 +0000

> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 17:40 -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> On the contrary, for networking I submit everything manually and I
>> remove the CC: tags.
>> 
>> I have a queue on patchwork that I add such patches to, so that they
>> do not get lost.
> 
> Ah, right. Thanks for the correction. Is it even worth giving the hint
> that this should be for the stable tree (from v3.5 onwards), or should I
> leave you to work that all out for yourself? And if it *is* worth giving
> that hint, is it better to do it in a comment after --- at the end of
> the commit comment, rather than the "normal" 'Cc: stable' tag?

The more information you give in the commit message the better, that
way I don't have to guess :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html