netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] Containerize syslog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:16:06 -0600
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Rui Xiang <leo.ruixiang@...il.com>
Cc:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, serge.hallyn@...onical.com,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] Containerize syslog

Rui Xiang <leo.ruixiang@...il.com> writes:

> On 2012-11-19 22:37, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:

>> I understand that user namespaces aren't 100% usable yet, but looking
>> long term, is there a reason to have the syslog namespace separate
>> from user namespace?
>
> Actually we don't have strong preference. We'll think more about it. Hope we can make
> consensus with Eric.

I hope I am not hard to work with.  My primary concern is reasonable
looking code and good long term maintainable semantics.

I really don't care in which namespace where we file the kernel log
statements.

I care much more about which kernel log print statements we want filed
differently.

Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html