[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121126204722.GA26463@elgon.mountain>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:47:22 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: steve.glendinning@...well.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: re: smsc95xx: detect chip revision specific features
Hello Steve Glendinning,
The patch 9ebca5071c86: "smsc95xx: detect chip revision specific
features" from Nov 22, 2012, leads to the following warning:
drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c:1349 smsc95xx_suspend()
error: buffer overflow 'filter_mask' 8 <= 31
drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c
1283 if (pdata->wolopts & (WAKE_BCAST | WAKE_MCAST | WAKE_ARP | WAKE_UCAST)) {
1284 u32 *filter_mask = kzalloc(32, GFP_KERNEL);
^^
We allocate 8 unsigned 32 bit values. I think this is the mistake here
actually. It is a typo and should say:
u32 *filter_mask = kzalloc(sizeof(u32) * 32, GFP_KERNEL);
If 8 elements was the intent then that's nasty.
1285 u32 command[2];
1286 u32 offset[2];
1287 u32 crc[4];
1288 int wuff_filter_count =
1289 (pdata->features & FEATURE_8_WAKEUP_FILTERS) ?
1290 LAN9500A_WUFF_NUM : LAN9500_WUFF_NUM;
LAN9500A_WUFF_NUM is 8. LAN9500_WUFF_NUM is 4.
1291 int i, filter = 0;
1292
[snip]
1348 for (i = 0; i < (wuff_filter_count * 4); i++) {
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
We are either counting to 15 or 31, and both are more that 8.
1349 ret = smsc95xx_write_reg_nopm(dev, WUFF, filter_mask[i]);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So we're going past the end of the 8 element array.
1350 if (ret < 0)
1351 kfree(filter_mask);
1352 check_warn_return(ret, "Error writing WUFF\n");
1353 }
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists