[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121127114751.6961da02245ed6851190aca2@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:47:51 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the infiniband
tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c between commit 08ff32352d6f
("mlx4: 64-byte CQE/EQE support") from the infiniband tree and commit
f1d29a3fa68b ("mlx4_en: Remove remnants of LRO support") from the
net-next tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
index 6fa106f,f76c967..0000000
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
@@@ -710,12 -709,9 +710,9 @@@ next
++cq->mcq.cons_index;
index = (cq->mcq.cons_index) & ring->size_mask;
- cqe = &cq->buf[index];
+ cqe = &cq->buf[(index << factor) + factor];
- if (++polled == budget) {
- /* We are here because we reached the NAPI budget -
- * flush only pending LRO sessions */
+ if (++polled == budget)
goto out;
- }
}
out:
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists