[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50B63CF4.8070404@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:33:56 +0100
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, andy@...yhouse.net, fubar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: make arp_ip_target parameter checks consistent
with sysfs
Actually I did see it from kernel/module.c and didn't come up with it
myself.
Anyway I will re-post with the change and will take a note for the future.
Thanks for the review
On 28/11/12 17:23, David Miller wrote:
> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov<nikolay@...hat.com>
> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:21:15 +0100
>
>> @@ -4706,12 +4706,14 @@ static int bond_check_params(struct bond_params *params)
>> arp_ip_count++) {
>> /* not complete check, but should be good enough to
>> catch mistakes */
>> - if (!isdigit(arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count][0])) {
>> + __be32 ip = in_aton(arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count]);
>> + if (!isdigit(arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count][0])
>> + || ip == 0
>> + || ip == htonl(INADDR_BROADCAST)) {
> Please format this properly, put the connecting operators at the end,
> not the beginning, of the lines of the if statement, like so:
>
> if (!isdigit(arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count][0]) ||
> ip == 0 ||
> ip == htonl(INADDR_BROADCAST)) {
>
> Where else did you see the layout you used? It's not a prevalent
> construct, so as far as I can tell you came up with it on your own.
>
> Please don't do this, and instead use existing practice as your guide.
>
> Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists