[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1354107140.14302.140.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 04:52:20 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, saku@...i.fi,
rick.jones2@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP and reordering
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 12:39 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> I'll go back to looking at TSQ, and BQL for PPP. If I have to use
> skb_orphan() and install a destructor of my own in order to do BQL for
> PPP, that'll upset TSQ a little. Is there a way we could *chain* the
> destructors... skb_clone() to put the skbs on the PPP channels' queues,
> perhaps, then free the original from the PPP destructor? Or is that too
> much overhead?
>
> I've killed most of the channel queue for PPPoATM and PPPoE now, but
> L2TP still has a whole load of buffering all the way through the stack
> again before it really leaves the host.
>
> (And PPPoE will still have the txqueuelen on the Ethernet device too).
>
BQL is nice for high speed adapters.
For slow one, you always can stop the queue for each packet given to
start_xmit()
And restart the queue at TX completion.
Some device drivers do that (because the hardware has a single slot, no
ring buffer, not because they wanted to fight bufferbloat ;) )
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists