[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1354214521.3299.30.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:42:01 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: raj@...dy.usa.hp.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] doc: make the description of how tcp_ecn
works more explicit and clear
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 13:16 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: raj@...dy.usa.hp.com (Rick Jones)
> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:53:10 -0800 (PST)
>
> > From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
> >
> > Make the description of how tcp_ecn works a bit more explicit and clear.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
>
> Applied, thanks Rick.
>
> I think we should change the default to one, to be honest. I thought
> that's what we were doing by now...
>
> '2' made sense 10 years ago, but it doesn't really today.
With 1 setting, I for example was enable to connect to a HP device,
when I was still working for SFR.
(It was an HTTP/HTTPS based administrative software, to manage HP c7000
enclosures)
I would suggest making a large scale experiment before doing this 2->1
move.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists