[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1354208920.14302.1907.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:08:40 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH V2 8/9] net: frag queue locking per hash bucket
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 17:15 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> This patch implements per hash bucket locking for the frag queue
> hash. This removes two write locks, and the only remaining write
> lock is for protecting hash rebuild. This essentially reduce the
> readers-writer lock to a rebuild lock.
So we still have this huge contention on the reader-writer lock cache
line...
I would just remove it. (And remove hash rebuild, or make it RCU
compatible )
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists